|
| |
... |
|
|
|
... |
The house is New-England type, with Federal styling. It was begun by Jacob Eichelberner in 1826 or 1827, who ran out of money after building the walls and putting a roof on the house. It stood unfinished for almost ten years until John Wood bought and finished it. John and Ellen (Strong) Wood were the fourth grandparents of the late Princess Diana of Wales.*
Schilder Brother's Produce Warehouse, 41 and 43 South Walnut Street
It was built sometime between 1890 and 1894 by Charles, Ed and Tom Schilder, who were partners as "produce and commission merchants" dealing in potatoes, apples, beans, onions, and onion sets.
Schindler Cold Storage Warehouse, 37 South Walnut Street
This was built by the Schindler Brothers as cold storage for some of their produce.* It was probably built around the same time as the larger warehouse, probably either earlier or later since its function was not incorporated into the larger building. It is coincidently similar in appearance to the "Chillicothe Brick Cottages."
James Bungalow, 89 West Fourth Street
This house is a "Semi-Bungalow" or dormer-Front Bungalow type, built about between 1918 and 1930.
Metal-Sheathed Addition, 35? South Walnut Street
This building / addition has practical merit as usable warehouse space, but no architectural or historical merit. It is a utilitarian, unstyled, recent construction that is barely visible from either streets and contributes nothing to the streetscape.
Owner Tom Gallagher applied to the Chillicothe Design Review Board for approval to demolish buildings and additions. [Is this the first application?]
[Source: Chillicothe Design Review Board, minutes for 19 June 2003 meeting, pages 7-10.]
Chillicothe Design Review Board finally approved the demolition application, with the privision that a brick be built to screen the parking lot. The vote was 6:1 in favor.
[Source: Chillicothe Design Review Board, minutes for 19 February 2004 meeting, Item 4.]
I composed and delivered a professional letter to the Chillicothe Design Review Board for their 19 February (?) 2004 meeting.
Note how I spelled out the history and significance of each building or addition on the property, explained the preservation issues involved in this, and pointed out the legal duties of the board:
|
27 January 2004 [?] Members of the Chillicothe Design Review Board: With the recent drawn-out discussion of the Walnut Street Methodist Church's proposal to develop a parking lot at the northeast corner of South Walnut and West Fourth streets, I present my professional observations regarding the structures on the property for the sake of a wise and informed decision concerning their fate - especially regarding the duties of the Design Review Board as stated in city ordinance 1197.02(a). I am an architectural historian with a dozen years of field experience and a masters degree, and a local historian who has presented several lectures and written many articles on architecture and history. I grew up in Ross County and have become only more familiar with its history and architecture after my return from Columbus last spring. The Ross County Historical Society, Ross-Chillicothe Convention and Visitors Bureau, South Central Ohio Preservation Society, Chillicothe Restoration Foundation, and other groups can attest to my knowledge and skill. The criteria of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is a standard model to gage the importance of a historical building, place, or site. In this context, there are two subjects of significance (architecture and history) and three levels of significance (national, state and local). A fourth level of significance can be considered, that of "neighborhood" or "streetscape" significance, as simply a contributing part of the district NRHP nomination. This property under consideration is within the Chillicothe Central Business National Register District (entered 6/11/79) and Chillicothe Old Residential National Register District (entered 11/28/73), and so all the buildings are officially included in the National Register. As part of a district nomination, not all the included buildings may be individually eligible to the National Register, but are included as part of a larger context, are significant as a grouping, and can be listed. There are six buildings or additions on the property. (The * asterisked information was graciously supplied by historian John Grabb.)
The Metal-Sheathed Addition is unquestionably expendable, and could be demolished soon to provide immediate parking. I urge to the Design Review Board to not allow demolition of the Warehouse Addition. Its significance far outweighs the desire for more parking, however well-designed and screened. The James Bungalow and the Schindler Cold Storage Warehouse are significant primarily to the streetscape; I would regret their loss, but if appropriate screening is built in their place, their loss can be sufficiently mitigated. If demolished, I recommend that they be recorded by photographs and drawn plans, to be archived in Chillicothe and at the Ohio Historic Preservation Office in Columbus. (I could perform this at no charge.) Appropriate screening would best be in the form of a brick wall along the street and alley sides of the parking area to hide parked vehicles and the architectural void (as proposed already). A 4.5 to 6 foot wall capped with stone and with regular pilasters would be most appropriate; the Chillicothe Telephone parking lot on East Fourth Street is an excellent example. Adding appropriately styled lights atop the wall would further enhance its appearance, such as at the "Dock on Water." Other than being a bit too low, the wall beside St. Mary Church is also a good example. If the Bungalow is replaced with a parking lot exit, the drive should be carefully screened and designed to blend into the residential streetscape. However, I urge the Board to consider carefully the loss of these two buildings. The more a downtown district is depopulated of contributing buildings, the more difficult it is to retain and enhance its character. Chillicothe's downtown and inner residential areas have suffered too many demolitions in the last fifteen years, and few of what has replaced the lost contributing buildings has been equal to their character and utility. The traditional downtown is the opposite of modern suburbia; widening streets and alleys, creating too many parking lots or landscaped voids and leaving them unscreened, and eliminating too many buildings of any significance will only hasten the demise of the downtown as a place to shop, tour and live in. Parking is a modern necessity, but too often parking "crises" are more the result of bad parking habits, poor utilization/coordination/cooperative management of existing parking areas, and skewed perceptions based on suburban commercial parking. The Design Review Board is charged by law with a duty to "maintain and enhance the distinctive character of the Preservation District by safeguarding the architectural integrity of the various period structures within it, and to prevent intrusions and alterations within this district that would be incompatible with this established character" (ord. 1197.02(a)). Furthermore, I ask why the dilapidated blue warehouse (88? West Fourth) on the corner opposite the Eichelberner-Wood House has not been considered for its parking potential. Like the Metal-Sheathed Addition, is a recent building that has no architectural or historical merit, and additionally is a dangerously unsecured eyesore that has been begging for years to be replaced with anything and is probably in a legal state that would make that easy to do. I trust my professional opinion will be considered by the members of the Chillicothe Design Review Board for a wise and informed decision in this matter. I have given my professional time to research and prepare this letter in the hopes of improving and enlightening stewardship of the irreplaceable Chillicothe downtown. Sincerely, Kevin B. Coleman |
The Chillicothe Conservancy gave up on pursuing a lawsuit to prevent demolition.
[Source: Franklin Conaway, Chillicothe Conservancy member.]
Demolition began - on a weekend. The most historic buildings / additions were demolished first. The timing and 'plan of attack' of the demolition appeared to be every bit intended to avoid legal impediments and to quickly pass the point-of-no-return.
Although there were several possible factors for beginning demolition at the alley and along the street - the Fourth Street bungalow appeared to be still inhabited, and the electrical service was apparently still on in the south end of the warehouse - .
The targeted structures were mostly cleared with two weeks.
[Source: Eyewitness.]
|
| |
... |